您的位置: turnitin查重官网> 图书馆 >> 版本学 >以《人民日报》元旦社看编辑部身份变迁

以《人民日报》元旦社看编辑部身份变迁

收藏本文 2024-02-21 点赞:5489 浏览:16250 作者:网友投稿原创标记本站原创

摘要:随着语篇在后现代生活中发挥着越来越重要的作用,语篇的身份建构探讨也得到了越来越多的批评性语篇浅析学家的重视。本论文以《人民日报》1954、1968和2005年的元旦社论为浅析文本,通过比较浅析,以历时的角度探讨编辑部身份的变迁,并且进一步揭示社会变迁与话语及身份建构之间的的联系。本论文依据身份论述、语篇的建构功能以及话语与社会变迁的联系论述,通过人称代词浅析法、情态法以及宏观结构浅析法对三篇元旦社论进行系统的浅析。探讨发现,1)在人称代词方面,人称代词“我们”的指代范畴已以“exclusive we”转变为“inclusive we”;2)在情态方面,一方面,每一千字中,联系型情态动词总数所占比重已趋于下降。另一方面,“必须”、“应该”、“要”以及“可以”这四个联系型情态动词出现的次数已减少,并且中、高等级的情态动词出现的频率降低,低等级的情态动词被越来越多的利用;3)在宏观结构方面,元旦社论在篇幅、开头结尾、题材内容以及行文风格上都做了调整和转变,话语功能以政治话语转变为节庆话语。通过比较三篇社论在语言选择方面的区别,本论文浅析得出编辑部的权威性减弱,与公众之间的权势联系趋于缓和或弱化。元旦社论话语功能不再是政治宣传或政策指导,而是节庆祝贺展望未来。在此基础上,本论文总结得出以1954到1968,再到2005年,编辑部的身份已以代言人变为了单纯的报社编辑部。接着,本论文对三篇社论的社会历史背景进行了浅析,以期探讨引起编辑部身份变迁的理由。浅析发现,随着社会的进展,编辑部根据传播对象和传播方式的转变适时对自己的身份进行重构。关键词:元旦社论论文《人民日报》论文身份论文建构论文社会变迁论文人称代词论文情态论文宏观结构论文

    摘要4-5

    Abstract5-9

    Chapter 1 Introduction9-13

    1.1 New Year Editorials in People’s Daily and the three New Year Editorials9-10

    1.2 The theories and methodologies of the study10-11

    1.3 Research questions and aims of the study11

    1.4 The structure of the thesis11-13

    Chapter 2 Literature Review13-27

    2.1 Theoretical background of the study13-22

    2.1.1 Discourse13-16

    2.1.1.1 What is discourse13-14

    2.1.1.2 Discourse and social practice14-16

    2.1.1.3 Constitutive power of discourse16

    2.1.2 Identity16-20

    2.1.2.1 Identity from a philosophical and sociological perspective17-18

    2.1.2.2 Identity from a social-semiotic perspective18-19

    2.1.2.3 Identity from a CDA perspective19-20

    2.1.3 Discourse and social change20-22

    2.2 Previous study of constitutive power of discourse22-24

    2.3 Previous study of Editorials of People’s Daily24-27

    Chapter 3 Methodology and Analytical Framework27-33

    3.1 Pronoun27-29

    3.2 Modapty29-31

    3.3 Analytical framework for the present study31-33

    Chapter 4 Discursive Construction of the Editorial department’s Identity33-61

    4.1 Discourse analysis of the Three New Year Editorials33-53

    4.1.1 Pronoun33-40

    4.1.1.1 “We” in the 1954 New Year Editorial33-35

    4.1.1.2 “We” in the 1968 New Year Editorial35-37

    4.1.1.3 “We” in the 2005 New Year Editorial37-40

    4.1.2 Modapty40-51

    4.1.2.1 Statistics and analysis of the total relational modapty in each editorial40-44

    4.1.2.2 Statistics and analysis of single relational modapty44-51

    4.1.3 Macro-structure51-53

    4.2 Identity change constructed from the Three New Year Editorials53-58

    4.2.1 The change of power relations between the editorial department and the pubpc53-56

    4.2.2 The change of discourse function56-57

    4.2.3 The change of identity of the editorial department57-58

    4.3 Discussion of reasons for the change in the editorial department’s identity58-61

    Chapter 5 Conclusion61-64

    5.1 Findings and contributions of the study61-63

    5.2 Limitations and further research of the study63-64

    Bibpography64-69

    Appendix 1 New Year Editorial in 195469-74

    Appendix 2 New Year Editorial in 196874-80

    Appendix 3 New Year Editorial in 200580-82

    Acknowledgement82-83

    攻读硕士期间所发表的论文83-84

copyright 2003-2024 Copyright©2020 Powered by 网络信息技术有限公司 备案号: 粤2017400971号