您的位置: turnitin查重官网> 汉语言文学 >> 古代文学 >试议判决书中文刑事判决书树状信息结构

试议判决书中文刑事判决书树状信息结构

收藏本文 2024-03-09 点赞:19372 浏览:84461 作者:网友投稿原创标记本站原创

摘要:判决书是司法公正的载体,是司法文明的具体展现。判决书自以2009年上网以来,引起了极大的社会关注。中文刑事判决书文本作为具有法律效力的规范性文件,有着其特殊的树状信息结构。由此这一课题是法学,语言学等学科探讨法律语言不足的重要内容。本论文选用河南省一审中文刑事判决书作为探讨对象,开展中文刑事判决书的信息结构探讨。国内有关判决书的探讨多见于其它论述浅析,有关法律语篇树状信息结构探讨以及运用,还没有得到应有的重视。本论文借助于法律语篇树状信息结构(杜金榜,2007:43),利用信息点标注、信息分类标注和信息源标注的策略,对河南省一审中文刑事判决书探讨,辅以数据统计,浅析其树状信息结构。首先文章简要介绍课题探讨的必要性及探讨不足相关内容。回顾总结了国内外已有的相关探讨,概述了法律语篇树状信息结构在法律语言学中的运用,并指出国内在此领域探讨的不足。其次具体阐述探讨的指导论述。再次本论文以河南省不同城市和不同县市的判决书为例,探讨了中文刑事判决书的树状信息结构。最后文章总结河南中文刑事判决书的树状信息结构特点、文章局限性及探讨历程、并展望未来探讨。探讨表明,法律语篇树状信息结构作为法律语言学论述,可以用于浅析中文刑事判决书,揭示出中文刑事判决书的信息结构特点。作者希望本探讨能以语言学的视角更好地帮助读者理解中文刑事判决书,关注法律语篇树状信息结构这一法律语言学论述及其运用。关键词:中文刑事判决书论文树状信息结构论文法律语言学论文

    摘要3-4

    Abstract4-6

    Abbreviations6-7

    List of Tables7-8

    List of Figures8-9

    Contents9-11

    Chapter One Introduction11-15

    1.1 Introduction11-12

    1.2 Significance of the thesis12-13

    1.3 Objectives and research questions13

    1.4 Organization of the thesis13-15

    Chapter Two Literature Review15-25

    2.0 Introduction15

    2.1 Legal discourse studies15-20

    2.1.1 Foreign studies of legal discourse15-18

    2.1.2 Domestic studies of legal discourse18-20

    2.2 Discourse information structure studies abroad20-21

    2.3 The apppcations of TISLD at home21-23

    2.4 Linguistic researches of Chinese criminal judicial verdicts23

    2.5 Summary23-25

    Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation25-31

    3.1 Several models of discourse information structure25-27

    3.1.1 Information trichotomy model25

    3.1.2 Labov’s information classification model25-26

    3.1.3 Interrogative structure model26

    3.1.4 D-tree model26-27

    3.2 Tree information structure of legal discourse27-29

    3.3 Summary29-31

    Chapter Four Practical Analysis of Chinese Criminal Judicial Verdicts31-51

    4.0 Introduction31

    4.1 Data underlying the thesis31-32

    4.2 TIS analysis of fraud verdict32-36

    4.2.1 TIS analysis of fraud verdict from Zhengzhou32

    4.2.2 TIS analysis of fraud verdict from Xinyang32-33

    4.2.3 TIS analysis of fraud verdict from Jiaozuo33-34

    4.2.4 TIS analysis of fraud verdict from Shangqiu34-36

    4.2.5 Summary36

    4.3 TIS analysis of depberate injury verdict36-40

    4.3.1 TIS analysis of depberate injury verdict from Luoyang36-37

    4.3.2 TIS analysis of depberate injury verdict from Jiyuan37-38

    4.3.3 TIS analysis of depberate injury verdict from Anyang38-39

    4.3.4 TIS analysis of depberate injury verdict from Xinxiang39

    4.3.5 Summary39-40

    4.4 TIS analysis of committing traffic offence verdict40-44

    4.4.1 TIS analysis of committing traffic offence verdict from Luoyang40-41

    4.4.2 TIS analysis of committing traffic offence verdict from San menxia41-42

    4.4.3 TIS analysis of committing traffic offence verdict from Zhumadian42-43

    4.4.4 Summary43-44

    4.5 TIS analysis of pilferage verdict44-47

    4.5.1 TIS analysis of pilferage verdict from Kaifeng44-45

    4.5.2 TIS analysis of pilferage verdict from Nanyang45

    4.5.3 TIS analysis of pilferage verdict from Zhoukou45-46

    4.5.4 Summary46-47

    4.6 TIS analysis of contract fraud verdict47-51

    4.6.1 TIS analysis of contract fraud verdict from Pingdingshan47-48

    4.6.2 TIS analysis of contract fraud verdict from Puyang48

    4.6.3 TIS analysis of contract fraud verdict from Zhengzhou48-49

    4.6.4 Summary49-51

    Chapter Five Conclusion51-55

    5.1 Features of different types of CCJVs in Henan Province51

    5.2 Suggestions for improvement of TIS of CCJVs in Henan51-52

    5.3 Limitations of the study52-53

    5.4 Suggestion for further researches53

    5.5 Summary of the study53-55

    References55-57

    Acknowledgements57-59

    攻读硕士学位期间的探讨成果59

copyright 2003-2024 Copyright©2020 Powered by 网络信息技术有限公司 备案号: 粤2017400971号